People v. Stanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stanley

38 A.D.2d 927, 330 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5093

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 927 (People v. Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stanley, 38 A.D.2d 927, 330 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to relieve counsel denied in all respects, without prejudice to an application for reargument of the appeal if so advised. This application, received by the court after determination of the appeal, is for the relief of counsel and for permission to submit a brief by the Inmate Defense League — apparently an informal group of prisoners in the same institution in which the defendant is confined. The presentation by the assigned counsel was, in our opinion, entirely adequate, and no basis has been shown for the relief requested. However, if the defendant feels that additional points should be submitted, he may, if so advised, apply for reargument. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to relieve counsel denied in all respects, without prejudice to an application for reargument of the appeal if so advised. This application, received by the court after determination of the appeal, is for the relief of counsel and for permission to submit a brief by the Inmate Defense League — apparently an informal group of prisoners in the same institution in which the defendant is confined. The presentation by the assigned counsel was, in our opinion, entirely adequate, and no basis has been shown for the relief requested. However, if the defendant feels that additional points should be submitted, he may, if so advised, apply for reargument. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 927, 330 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stanley-nyappdiv-1972.