People v. Stanley

California Court of Appeal

People v. Stanley

11 P.2d 415, 123 Cal. App. 290, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 838

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 2, 1932

DocketDocket No. 1207.

StatusPublished

This text of 11 P.2d 415 (People v. Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stanley, 11 P.2d 415, 123 Cal. App. 290, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 838 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Sacramento County of a felony, to wit: Burglary.

[1] The transcript on appeal was filed in this court March 16, 1932. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on May 2, 1932. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed. *Page 291

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Sacramento County of a felony, to wit: Burglary.

[1] The transcript on appeal was filed in this court March 16, 1932. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on May 2, 1932. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed. *Page 291

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 P.2d 415, 123 Cal. App. 290, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stanley-calctapp-1932.