People v. Stancu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stancu

106 A.D.2d 592, 483 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21582

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 24, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 A.D.2d 592 (People v. Stancu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stancu, 106 A.D.2d 592, 483 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Farlo, J.), rendered June 8, 1983, convicting him of rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree and assault in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

While the testimony of defendant and the complainant conflicted on the issue of forcible compulsion, as a matter of law it cannot be said that the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, was legally insufficient (People v Walstatter, 53 NY2d 871; People v Stoesser, 92 AD2d 650).

We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. O’Connor, J. P.. Brown, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Farlo, J.), rendered June 8, 1983, convicting him of rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree and assault in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

While the testimony of defendant and the complainant conflicted on the issue of forcible compulsion, as a matter of law it cannot be said that the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, was legally insufficient (People v Walstatter, 53 NY2d 871; People v Stoesser, 92 AD2d 650).

We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. O’Connor, J. P.. Brown, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.2d 592, 483 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stancu-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack