People v. St. Mary

2018 NY Slip Op 493
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 25, 2018
Docket108631
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 493 (People v. St. Mary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. St. Mary, 2018 NY Slip Op 493 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v St. Mary (2018 NY Slip Op 00493)
People v Mary
2018 NY Slip Op 00493
Decided on January 25, 2018
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: January 25, 2018

108631

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

GARY R. ST. MARY, Appellant.


Calendar Date: December 13, 2017
Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ.

Adam H. Van Buskirk, Chateaugay, for appellant.

Craig P. Carriero, District Attorney, Malone (Jennifer M. Hollis of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main Jr., J.), rendered March 22, 2016, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a five-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. County Court sentenced defendant, in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, to a prison term of eight years followed by 2½ years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive given, among other things, his remorse and acceptance of responsibility for the crime. However,

defendant's unchallenged appeal waiver precludes our review of this contention (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Haines, 154 AD3d 1017, 1017 [2017]; People v Odom, 150 AD3d 1484, 1485 [2017]).

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Odom
2017 NY Slip Op 3992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Haines
2017 NY Slip Op 7013 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-st-mary-nyappdiv-2018.