People v. St. Clair

56 Cal. 406, 1880 Cal. LEXIS 419
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1880·No. No. 10,588·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

By the Count :

The indictment charges an entry into a stable with intent to commit “larcey.” Burglary is the entering of a house, etc., “ with intent to commit grand or petit larceny, or any felony.” (Pen. Code, § 459.) There is no such felony as “ larcey ” known to our "law. “Larcey ” is certainly not “larceny,” nor does the maxim, idem sonans, apply.

It is said that the Court must give judgment without regard to the technical errors or defects, or to exceptions which do not affect the substantial rights of the parties. (Pen. Code, § 1258.) But this is more than a departure from an established form; nor is it a case in which facts are averred in the indictment, which sufficiently indicate the sense in which the word purporting to name the crime is employed; but is a failure to describe any ofíense.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. St. Clair, 56 Cal. 406, 1880 Cal. LEXIS 419 (Cal. 1880).

56 Cal. 406 (People v. St. Clair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Taylor, N.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2024
People v. Brown
758 P.2d 1135 (California Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Mechanik
475 U.S. 66 (Supreme Court, 1986)
People v. Ross
429 P.2d 606 (California Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Egan
266 P. 581 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
People v. Brady
65 P. 823 (California Supreme Court, 1901)