People v. Squires

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Squires

193 N.W.2d 208, 36 Mich. App. 189

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 30, 1971

DocketDocket No. 11264

StatusPublished

This text of 193 N.W.2d 208 (People v. Squires) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Squires, 193 N.W.2d 208, 36 Mich. App. 189 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was convicted by the court sitting without a jury of larceny from the person. Defendant was placed on three years probation, the first six months to be served in the Detroit House of Correction. Defendant was at all times represented by counsel.

Defendant appeals as of right. The people have filed a motion to affirm the conviction and sentence.

Upon study of the briefs and records, it is manifest that the issues raised on appeal are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was convicted by the court sitting without a jury of larceny from the person. Defendant was placed on three years probation, the first six months to be served in the Detroit House of Correction. Defendant was at all times represented by counsel.

Defendant appeals as of right. The people have filed a motion to affirm the conviction and sentence.

Upon study of the briefs and records, it is manifest that the issues raised on appeal are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 N.W.2d 208, 36 Mich. App. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-squires-michctapp-1971.