People v. Spruill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Spruill

62 A.D.2d 1065, 404 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11159

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 62 A.D.2d 1065 (People v. Spruill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Spruill, 62 A.D.2d 1065, 404 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 27, 1977, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment with a maximum of 15 years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of five years. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 27, 1977, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment with a maximum of 15 years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of five years. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.D.2d 1065, 404 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-spruill-nyappdiv-1978.