People v. Sprowal

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Sprowal

219 N.E.2d 878, 18 N.Y.2d 683, 273 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1244

New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 7, 1966·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendant contended that section 722-b of the Penal Law of the State of New York, as applied to him, violated his rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that no rights of defendant under these amendments were violated. [See 17 N Y 2d 884.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendant contended that section 722-b of the Penal Law of the State of New York, as applied to him, violated his rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that no rights of defendant under these amendments were violated. [See 17 N Y 2d 884.]

People v. Sprowal, 219 N.E.2d 878, 18 N.Y.2d 683, 273 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1244 (N.Y. 1966).

Pincite

219 N.E.2d 878 (People v. Sprowal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related