People v. Springer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Springer

236 A.D.2d 566, 654 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1313

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D.2d 566 (People v. Springer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Springer, 236 A.D.2d 566, 654 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1313 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered December 14, 1994, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, [567]*567after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of robbery in the first degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenges to the court’s finding that he violated the terms of his probation are either unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit (see, People v Halaby, 77 AD2d 717; People v Britton, 158 AD2d 932; People v Schneider, 188 AD2d 754; People v Clarke, 195 AD2d 569). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered December 14, 1994, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, [567]*567after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of robbery in the first degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenges to the court’s finding that he violated the terms of his probation are either unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit (see, People v Halaby, 77 AD2d 717; People v Britton, 158 AD2d 932; People v Schneider, 188 AD2d 754; People v Clarke, 195 AD2d 569). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D.2d 566, 654 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-springer-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack