People v. Springer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Springer

262 A.D. 810, 28 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5952

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 21, 1941·Published

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term to take proof and inquire into the conditions under which the infant child is living and determine what is best for his welfare. (Finlay v. Finlay, 240 N. Y. 429.) All concur, except Taylor and MeCurn, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance with leave to renew upon a showing that there is some danger to the safety, health, morals or reasonable comfort of the child. (The order dismiss a writ of habeas [811]*811corpus for custody of infant child.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCum, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term to take proof and inquire into the conditions under which the infant child is living and determine what is best for his welfare. (Finlay v. Finlay, 240 N. Y. 429.) All concur, except Taylor and MeCurn, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance with leave to renew upon a showing that there is some danger to the safety, health, morals or reasonable comfort of the child. (The order dismiss a writ of habeas [811]*811corpus for custody of infant child.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCum, JJ.

People v. Springer, 262 A.D. 810, 28 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 810 (People v. Springer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related