People v. Springer
This text of 262 A.D. 810 (People v. Springer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term to take proof and inquire into the conditions under which the infant child is living and determine what is best for his welfare. (Finlay v. Finlay, 240 N. Y. 429.) All concur, except Taylor and MeCurn, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance with leave to renew upon a showing that there is some danger to the safety, health, morals or reasonable comfort of the child. (The order dismiss a writ of habeas [811]*811corpus for custody of infant child.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCum, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 810, 28 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-springer-nyappdiv-1941.