People v. Spratt

135 A.D.2d 983, 522 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52876
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 135 A.D.2d 983 (People v. Spratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Spratt, 135 A.D.2d 983, 522 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

— Weiss, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Harris, J.), rendered March 28, 1986, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

In January 1985, defendant was placed on five years’ probation following his conviction for driving while intoxicated, a class E felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3], [5]). In February 1986, defendant was charged with violating the terms of probation as the result of two additional arrests for driving while intoxicated. Pursuant to a negotiated bargain, defendant pleaded guilty to the probation violation charge and was resentenced to a term of 1 to 3 years’ imprisonment.

The sole issue on appeal concerns the severity of the sentence. Focusing on his alcoholism, his work history and family responsibilities, defendant urges that we reduce the sentence as unduly harsh. We decline to do so. Defendant’s alcoholism cannot minimize the severity of having twice violated the terms of probation within a short period of time (see, People v Trevor QQ., 123 AD2d 465). In our view, County Court properly exercised its discretion by imposing a sentence within the terms of the plea bargain and the statutory guidelines (see, Penal Law § 70.00; People v Donnelly, 103 AD2d 941). We observe that County Court specifically directed that defendant be placed in a facility within the Department of Correctional Services that provides a full range of alcohol rehabilitation services.

Judgment affirmed. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dalton
247 A.D.2d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Squires
187 A.D.2d 764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Roberts
186 A.D.2d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Zimmer
184 A.D.2d 972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Brooks
182 A.D.2d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Frye
177 A.D.2d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Owens
175 A.D.2d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Weill
170 A.D.2d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Stanbro
168 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Le Cuyer
165 A.D.2d 956 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.D.2d 983, 522 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-spratt-nyappdiv-1987.