People v. Sprague
57 Cal. 147, 1 Colo. L. Rep. 36
Opinion
The remittitur on the former appeal having been regularly issued without inadvertence, we have no power to recall it; therefore, the motions that the remittitur be recalled and a bill of exceptions be settled are denied, and the order appealed from is affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Sprague, 57 Cal. 147, 1 Colo. L. Rep. 36 (Cal. 1880).
57 Cal. 147 (People v. Sprague) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chapman v. St. Stephens Protestant Episcopal, Church, Inc.
139 So. 188 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Petersen v. Civil Service Board
230 P. 196 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)
Crenshaw Bros. v. Southern Pacific Co.
183 P. 208 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
In re Estate of Levinson
41 P. 483 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
People v. McDermott
32 P. 7 (California Supreme Court, 1893)