People v. Spillman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Spillman

238 A.D.2d 452, 657 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3779

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D.2d 452 (People v. Spillman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Spillman, 238 A.D.2d 452, 657 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), rendered May 26, 1994, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has raised no nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. To the extent that the defendant raises the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel, the various factual assertions involve matters dehors the record. Therefore, the defendant’s claim is not properly before this Court on direct appeal (see, People v Grazzette, 211 AD2d 822; People v Dyson, 200 AD2d 756). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), rendered May 26, 1994, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has raised no nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. To the extent that the defendant raises the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel, the various factual assertions involve matters dehors the record. Therefore, the defendant’s claim is not properly before this Court on direct appeal (see, People v Grazzette, 211 AD2d 822; People v Dyson, 200 AD2d 756). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D.2d 452, 657 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-spillman-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack