People v. Spillino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Spillino

183 A.D.2d 927, 586 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7427

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 183 A.D.2d 927 (People v. Spillino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Spillino, 183 A.D.2d 927, 586 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Booth, J.), all rendered February 24, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 2814/79, attempted escape in the first degree under Indictment No. 3101/80, and assault in the second degree under Indictment No. 4535/80, and from a judgment of the same court, rendered July 21, [928]*9281983 (Demakos, J.), convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 734/82, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood, Rosenblatt and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Booth, J.), all rendered February 24, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 2814/79, attempted escape in the first degree under Indictment No. 3101/80, and assault in the second degree under Indictment No. 4535/80, and from a judgment of the same court, rendered July 21, [928]*9281983 (Demakos, J.), convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 734/82, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood, Rosenblatt and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 A.D.2d 927, 586 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-spillino-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack