People v. Sperin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sperin

250 A.D.2d 630, 672 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4872

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 4, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D.2d 630 (People v. Sperin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sperin, 250 A.D.2d 630, 672 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), both rendered November 21, 1996, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (one count under Indictment No. 3026/95 and two counts under Indictment No. 834/96), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. The record demonstrates that the defense counsel provided meaningful representation to the defendant (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI