People v. Sperber
275 A.D.2d 966
Opinion
In our opinion the trial court improperly permitted testimony as to conversations between complainant and defendant’s brother (cf. People v. Buzzi, 238 N. Y. 390); and a new trial is required in the interests of justice. In view of the above determination, the appeal from the order is dismissed. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Sperber, 275 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
275 A.D.2d 966 (People v. Sperber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. . Buzzi
144 N.E. 653 (New York Court of Appeals, 1924)