People v. Sperber
This text of 275 A.D.2d 966 (People v. Sperber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In our opinion the trial court improperly permitted testimony as to conversations between complainant and defendant’s brother (cf. People v. Buzzi, 238 N. Y. 390); and a new trial is required in the interests of justice. In view of the above determination, the appeal from the order is dismissed. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.D.2d 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sperber-nyappdiv-1949.