Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Spencer

People v. Spencer

209 A.D.2d 1011, 619 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12041
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 209 A.D.2d 1011 (People v. Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Spencer, 209 A.D.2d 1011, 619 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12041 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel by his counsel’s failure to make a timely motion to suppress (see, People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709). Defendant failed to demonstrate that there was no legitimate explanation for that failure (see, People v Garcia, 75 NY2d 973, 974; People v Duvall, 190 AD2d 988, lv denied 81 NY2d 1013). We conclude that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J.—Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Rivera
525 N.E.2d 698 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Garcia
555 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Duvall
190 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D.2d 1011, 619 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-spencer-nyappdiv-1994.