People v. Spencer

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Spencer. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 278
California Supreme Court·Decided September 13, 2018·No. S057242M·Published

Opinion

Filed 9/12/18

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S057242 v. ) ) CHRISTOPHER ALAN SPENCER, ) ) Santa Clara County Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. 155731 ____________________________________ )

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING THE COURT: The opinion in this matter filed July 12, 2018, and appearing at 5 Cal.5th 642, is modified as follows: On page 677 of the opinion, the first sentence in the paragraph beginning, “With the exception of the photographs, Spencer does not appear to have objected to the introduction of the victim impact evidence” is modified to add “specifically” before “objected,” “particular” before “victim,” and “at issue” to end the sentence. As modified, the sentence will now read:

With the exception of the photographs, Spencer does not appear to have specifically objected to the introduction of the particular victim impact evidence at issue.

1 The footnote appended to this sentence (fn. 5) is unchanged. This modification does not affect the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Spencer, (Cal. 2018).

People v. Spencer (People v. Spencer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Spencer
420 P.3d 1102 (California Supreme Court, 2018)