People v. Spedaleri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Spedaleri

85 A.D.2d 645, 449 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16461

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 85 A.D.2d 645 (People v. Spedaleri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Spedaleri, 85 A.D.2d 645, 449 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16461 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J., at plea; Santagata, J., at sentence), rendered July 25, 1980, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. By failing to make a motion to suppress evidence, the defendant waived his right to a judicial determination of his [646]*646contention that the weapon in question was unlawfully seized (see CPL 710.70, subd 3). The defendant’s contentions concerning the denial of his motion pursuant to CPL article 440 relate to material dehors the record and have not been considered in the determination of this appeal. Rabin, J. P., Hargett, O’Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J., at plea; Santagata, J., at sentence), rendered July 25, 1980, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. By failing to make a motion to suppress evidence, the defendant waived his right to a judicial determination of his [646]*646contention that the weapon in question was unlawfully seized (see CPL 710.70, subd 3). The defendant’s contentions concerning the denial of his motion pursuant to CPL article 440 relate to material dehors the record and have not been considered in the determination of this appeal. Rabin, J. P., Hargett, O’Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 A.D.2d 645, 449 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-spedaleri-nyappdiv-1981.