People v. Spears

2017 NY Slip Op 2068, 148 A.D.3d 1059, 48 N.Y.S.3d 624
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 22, 2017
Docket2014-06289
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2068 (People v. Spears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Spears, 2017 NY Slip Op 2068, 148 A.D.3d 1059, 48 N.Y.S.3d 624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed May 23, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

*1060 The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid. By informing the defendant that, in its courtroom, “everybody” who pleads guilty “waives their right to appeal,” the Supreme Court improperly conflated the right to appeal with one of the rights automatically forfeited by a plea of guilty (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; People v Mack, 142 AD3d 1185 [2016]).

However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Spears
29 N.Y.3d 1037 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 2068, 148 A.D.3d 1059, 48 N.Y.S.3d 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-spears-nyappdiv-2017.