People v. Spears

275 A.D.2d 682, 713 N.Y.S.2d 353, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10001
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Spears. Read the opinion of the Court — 276 A.D.2d 725

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Antonio Brandveen, J.), rendered May 11, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s Sandoval ruling balanced the appropriate factors [683]*683and was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459; People v Mattiace, 77 NY2d 269, 275-276; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292). Defendant’s theft-related convictions were highly relevant to his credibility, notwithstanding their similarity to the present charges. The court properly authorized the People to elicit certain factual details of defendant’s prior convictions because, under the circumstances of the case, their probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Spears, 275 A.D.2d 682, 713 N.Y.S.2d 353, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10001 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

275 A.D.2d 682 (People v. Spears) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Pavao
451 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Mattiace
568 N.E.2d 1189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)