People v. Spavone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Spavone

16 A.D.3d 525, 790 N.Y.S.2d 612, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2634

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from four sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin-Brandt, J.), all imposed July 21, 2003, upon his conviction of attempted robbery in the first degree (four counts; one each under Superior Court Information Nos. 2789/02, 25/03, 26/03, and 27/03), upon his pleas of guilty.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s waivers of his right to appeal preclude review of his claim that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; People v Iorio, 276 AD2d 564 [2000]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from four sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin-Brandt, J.), all imposed July 21, 2003, upon his conviction of attempted robbery in the first degree (four counts; one each under Superior Court Information Nos. 2789/02, 25/03, 26/03, and 27/03), upon his pleas of guilty.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s waivers of his right to appeal preclude review of his claim that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; People v Iorio, 276 AD2d 564 [2000]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

People v. Spavone, 16 A.D.3d 525, 790 N.Y.S.2d 612, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2634 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

16 A.D.3d 525 (People v. Spavone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related