People v. Sparrow

211 A.D.2d 577, 622 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 567
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sparrow. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 A.D.2d 1114

Opinion

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stephen Lloyd Barrett, J.), rendered July 2, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, 5 to 10 years and 2Vi to 5 years, respectively, unanimously held in abeyance, the motion to relieve counsel of his assignment granted and new counsel assigned.

Counsel has failed to raise and analyze a potentially meritorious issue concerning defendant’s conviction for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [5]), namely, whether the People proved the weight requirement under that statute (see, People v Ryan, 82 NY2d 497). "Since our own review cannot substitute for the single-minded advocacy of appellate counsel, assignment of new appellate counsel is required.” (People v Guerrone, 197 AD2d 460, 461.) Concur—Sullivan, J. R, Ellerin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sparrow, 211 A.D.2d 577, 622 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

211 A.D.2d 577 (People v. Sparrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ryan
626 N.E.2d 51 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Guerrone
197 A.D.2d 460 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)