Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Spangenberg

People v. Spangenberg

49 A.D.3d 969, 852 N.Y.2d 810
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 13, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.3d 969 (People v. Spangenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Spangenberg, 49 A.D.3d 969, 852 N.Y.2d 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of marihuana in the first degree and was sentenced to five years in prison with three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant’s sole contention on this appeal is that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. He is precluded, however, from raising this issue inasmuch as he made a knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of the right to appeal, both orally and in writing (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Volfson
69 A.D.3d 1123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 969, 852 N.Y.2d 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-spangenberg-nyappdiv-2008.