People v. Southerland
This text of 288 A.D.2d 497 (People v. Southerland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered March 29, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, criminal contempt in the first degree, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, after a non-jury trial, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the prosecution violated CPL 710.30 by not serving him with a list of its witnesses within 15 days after his arraignment is without merit. Since [498]*498there was no police-arranged identification procedure, CPL 710.30 does not apply (see, People v Richardson, 212 AD2d 743; People v Kavanaugh, 207 AD2d 719).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and S. Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 A.D.2d 497, 733 N.Y.S.2d 882, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-southerland-nyappdiv-2001.