People v. Soto
88 A.D.3d 553, 931 N.Y.2d 229
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Soto. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 A.D.3d 981 →
Opinion
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence established that an officer had a sufficient opportunity to observe defendant making a drug sale. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining credibility arguments. Concur — Gonzalez, PJ., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Soto, 88 A.D.3d 553, 931 N.Y.2d 229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
88 A.D.3d 553 (People v. Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)