People v. Soto

22 A.D.3d 512, 801 N.Y.S.2d 546
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 3, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated January 24, 2005 (People v Soto, 14 AD3d 626 [2005]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 28, 2003.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Soto, 22 A.D.3d 512, 801 N.Y.S.2d 546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

22 A.D.3d 512 (People v. Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Soto v. Conway
565 F. Supp. 2d 429 (E.D. New York, 2008)