People v. Soto

131 A.D.2d 895, 517 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48330
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Soto. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 A.D.2d 657

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), rendered August 16, 1983, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to raise his objection to the adequacy of his plea allocution before the Supreme Court, Kings County, and accordingly has not preserved Ms claim for appellate review (People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; cf., People v Riley, 120 AD2d 752). We have examined the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Soto, 131 A.D.2d 895, 517 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

131 A.D.2d 895 (People v. Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Riley
120 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)