People v. Sotero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sotero

254 A.D.2d 72, 678 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10146

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 8, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D.2d 72 (People v. Sotero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sotero, 254 A.D.2d 72, 678 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.), rendered November 13, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, and judgment, same court (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered November 15, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of violation of probation, and resentencing him to a consecutive term of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury’s credibility determinations. Nor do we find an abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.), rendered November 13, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, and judgment, same court (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered November 15, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of violation of probation, and resentencing him to a consecutive term of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury’s credibility determinations. Nor do we find an abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D.2d 72, 678 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sotero-nyappdiv-1998.