People v. Sosa
This text of 636 N.W.2d 127 (People v. Sosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Felix Ernesto SOSA, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
By order of September 12, 2000, ___ Mich. ___, 617 N.W.2d 693, the application for leave to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v. Maffett, (Docket No. 115185.) On order of the Court, the decision having been issued on July 18, 2001, 464 Mich. 878, 633 N.W.2d 339 (2001), the application from the December 28, 1999, 1999 WL 33326782 decision of the Court of Appeals is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CORRIGAN, C.J., concurs and states as follows:
I concur in the order denying leave to appeal, but I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting statement in People v. Maffett, 464 Mich. 878, 633 N.W.2d 339 (2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
636 N.W.2d 127, 465 Mich. 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sosa-mich-2001.