People v. Sordi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sordi

265 A.D.2d 195, 696 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10166

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 195 (People v. Sordi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sordi, 265 A.D.2d 195, 696 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Silverman, J.), rendered June 30, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of 6 months concurrent with a term of 5 years probation, unanimously affirmed.

Following a hearing, the court properly denied defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty plea since the record shows that his plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520). Defendant’s claims of inadequate factual allocution and coercion are belied by the minutes of the proceedings. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Silverman, J.), rendered June 30, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of 6 months concurrent with a term of 5 years probation, unanimously affirmed.

Following a hearing, the court properly denied defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty plea since the record shows that his plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520). Defendant’s claims of inadequate factual allocution and coercion are belied by the minutes of the proceedings. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 195, 696 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sordi-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack