People v. Sopa

142 A.D.2d 744, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8011

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.), rendered January 10, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (12 counts) and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738, reh denied 388 US 924; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

We have examined the contentions raised by the defendant in his supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Kunzeman, J. P., Weinstein, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sopa, 142 A.D.2d 744, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

142 A.D.2d 744 (People v. Sopa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)