People v. Sopa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sopa

142 A.D.2d 744, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8011

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 25, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 142 A.D.2d 744 (People v. Sopa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sopa, 142 A.D.2d 744, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.), rendered January 10, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (12 counts) and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738, reh denied 388 US 924; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

We have examined the contentions raised by the defendant in his supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Kunzeman, J. P., Weinstein, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.), rendered January 10, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (12 counts) and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738, reh denied 388 US 924; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

We have examined the contentions raised by the defendant in his supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Kunzeman, J. P., Weinstein, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 A.D.2d 744, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sopa-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack