People v. Sommerville

2025 NY Slip Op 06736
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 3, 2025
DocketInd. No. 71309/21
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 06736 (People v. Sommerville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sommerville, 2025 NY Slip Op 06736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Sommerville (2025 NY Slip Op 06736)

People v Sommerville
2025 NY Slip Op 06736
Decided on December 3, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 3, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
HELEN VOUTSINAS
LAURENCE L. LOVE
ELENA GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ.

2023-05816
(Ind. No. 71309/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Arkies Sommerville, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Robert C. Langdon of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Marie John of counsel; Rebecca Siegel on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Raymond L. Rodriguez, J.), imposed June 9, 2023, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 254, 257; People v Greenfeld, 234 AD3d 712, 712). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255-256).

IANNACCI, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, VOUTSINAS, LOVE and GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 06736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sommerville-nyappdiv-2025.