People v. Somers

78 N.Y.2d 1058
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 22, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 78 N.Y.2d 1058 (People v. Somers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Somers, 78 N.Y.2d 1058 (N.Y. 1991).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. The issues sought to be raised by defendant are not preserved for this Court’s review and, therefore, the Court cannot consider the merits.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Bellacos a. Judge Hancock, Jr., dissents and votes to reverse, concluding that defendant preserved the constitutional issue whether the application of Penal Law §§ 40.15 and 25.00 unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof to defendant, and that the trial court’s charge to the jury failed to safeguard against the insanity affirmative defense statute *1060 impermissibly shifting to defendant the burden of disproving intent (see, People v Kohl, 72 NY2d 191, 198-199).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Marlett
2021 NY Slip Op 01164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Gaston
221 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Richardson
212 A.D.2d 743 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Robson
197 A.D.2d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 N.Y.2d 1058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-somers-ny-1991.