People v. Solis

228 A.D.2d 738, 643 N.Y.S.2d 427

This text of 228 A.D.2d 738 (People v. Solis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Solis, 228 A.D.2d 738, 643 N.Y.S.2d 427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

After taking a television and video cassette recorder from a private residence, defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the second degree and was sentenced to IV2 to 41/2 years in prison. His attorney seeks to be relieved of representing defendant on appeal on the basis that there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised. Upon our review of the record, it is apparent that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea and that the sentence imposed was in accordance with the plea agreement. In view of this, the judgment must be affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 738, 643 N.Y.S.2d 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-solis-nyappdiv-1996.