People v. Solas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Solas

106 A.D.2d 417, 482 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21453

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 3, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 A.D.2d 417 (People v. Solas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Solas, 106 A.D.2d 417, 482 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeals by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marano, J.), both rendered June 3,1983, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (two counts), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

Since defendant’s contention that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas because the court failed to keep its promise as to the sentences he would receive if he was found not to be a second felony offender involves matters dehors the record, it may not be considered by this court on the appeals from the judgments of conviction (see People v Hood, 62 NY2d 863; People v Roberts, 89 AD2d 912; People v Johnson, 73 AD2d 652; People v Mann, 42 AD2d 587). Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeals by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marano, J.), both rendered June 3,1983, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (two counts), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

Since defendant’s contention that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas because the court failed to keep its promise as to the sentences he would receive if he was found not to be a second felony offender involves matters dehors the record, it may not be considered by this court on the appeals from the judgments of conviction (see People v Hood, 62 NY2d 863; People v Roberts, 89 AD2d 912; People v Johnson, 73 AD2d 652; People v Mann, 42 AD2d 587). Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.2d 417, 482 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-solas-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack