People v. Solari

California Court of Appeal

People v. Solari

155 P. 141, 27 Cal. App. 510

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 27, 1915

DocketCrim. No. 300.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 P. 141 (People v. Solari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Solari, 155 P. 141, 27 Cal. App. 510 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Defendant was indicted for the same crime involved in People v. Knowles, (Crim. No. 297), ante p. 498 this day decided. When the case came on for trial defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the same ground urged in the Knowles case and a like order was made as in that case. The people appeal from the order.

Solari was brought before the grand jury as a witness by subpoena, as was Knowles, and after he was sworn the district attorney made a statement to the witness substantially the same as he made to Knowles, to which he replied: “I am willing to make a statement.” Then follows his testimony, comprising some thirty odd pages of the transcript, and it is admitted that the indictment was based upon this testimony, at least in part. Upon the authority of the decision in People v. Knowles, (Crim. No. 297), ante, p. 498, the order is affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on July 26, 1915, and the following opinion then rendered thereon:

The application for hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal of the third district is denied, for the reasons stated in our opinion filed in denying such a petition in the case of People v. Knowles, (Crim. No. 297), ante, p. 498.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Defendant was indicted for the same crime involved in People v. Knowles, (Crim. No. 297), ante p. 498 this day decided. When the case came on for trial defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the same ground urged in the Knowles case and a like order was made as in that case. The people appeal from the order.

Solari was brought before the grand jury as a witness by subpoena, as was Knowles, and after he was sworn the district attorney made a statement to the witness substantially the same as he made to Knowles, to which he replied: “I am willing to make a statement.” Then follows his testimony, comprising some thirty odd pages of the transcript, and it is admitted that the indictment was based upon this testimony, at least in part. Upon the authority of the decision in People v. Knowles, (Crim. No. 297), ante, p. 498, the order is affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on July 26, 1915, and the following opinion then rendered thereon:

The application for hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal of the third district is denied, for the reasons stated in our opinion filed in denying such a petition in the case of People v. Knowles, (Crim. No. 297), ante, p. 498.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 P. 141, 27 Cal. App. 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-solari-calctapp-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack