People v. Soba

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Soba

25 A.D.3d 425, 806 N.Y.S.2d 415

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.3d 425 (People v. Soba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Soba, 25 A.D.3d 425, 806 N.Y.S.2d 415 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered September 25, 2003, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of sodomy in the third degree, sexual abuse in the third degree (four counts) and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

[426]*426The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility, including its resolution of inconsistencies in testimony (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered September 25, 2003, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of sodomy in the third degree, sexual abuse in the third degree (four counts) and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

[426]*426The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility, including its resolution of inconsistencies in testimony (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.3d 425, 806 N.Y.S.2d 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-soba-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack