People v. Snyder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Snyder

7 A.D.3d 819, 776 N.Y.S.2d 862, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7252

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.3d 819 (People v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Snyder, 7 A.D.3d 819, 776 N.Y.S.2d 862, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7252 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), imposed June 26, 2002, upon his conviction of assault in the second degree.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

[820]*820The defendant has not raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief, and, in any event, the issues raised are not properly before this Court. Santucci, J.E, Smith, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), imposed June 26, 2002, upon his conviction of assault in the second degree.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

[820]*820The defendant has not raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief, and, in any event, the issues raised are not properly before this Court. Santucci, J.E, Smith, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.3d 819, 776 N.Y.S.2d 862, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-snyder-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack