People v. Snow

244 A.D.2d 911, 668 N.Y.S.2d 128, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12268
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Snow. Read the opinion of the Court — 225 A.D.2d 1031

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in refusing to grant his request for a missing witness charge. We disagree. Defendant failed to make the requisite prima facie showing that the missing witness was in the control of the prosecution and could be expected to testify favorably to the prosecution (see, People v Macana, 84 NY2d 173, 177; People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 427; People v Coleman [William], 244 AD2d 910 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Scudder, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Snow, 244 A.D.2d 911, 668 N.Y.S.2d 128, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 911 (People v. Snow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. MacAna
639 N.E.2d 13 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Gonzalez
502 N.E.2d 583 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Coleman
244 A.D.2d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)