People v. Snow
This text of 117 A.D.2d 1019 (People v. Snow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that he is entitled to a new trial because he was denied Brady material cannot be reviewed on this appeal from the judgment of conviction since none of the matters upon which defendant relies appears in the record. We reject defendant’s other arguments that the verdict is repugnant (see, People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1) and that the second felony offender statute is unconstitutional (see, People v Sherman, 96 AD2d 1003; see also, People v Morse, 62 NY2d 205, 217-218). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.—rape, first degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 A.D.2d 1019, 499 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-snow-nyappdiv-1986.