People v. Smith

3 Utah 425
Utah Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Emerson, J.:

The defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery. A motion for a new trial was made, which was denied. This appeal is from the order denying a new trial.

No bill of exceptions, as provided by section 313 of the criminal code, was ever prepared or settled. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, this court will not review the action of the trial court on a motion for a new trial. A recital in the order’ that exception was taken will not suffice, but the bill must be taken. There being no error complained of in the judgment-roll, and none appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Hunter, C. J., and Twiss, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Smith, 3 Utah 425 (Utah 1884).

3 Utah 425 (People v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perego v. Dodge
9 Utah 3 (Utah Supreme Court, 1893)