People v. Smith

2026 NY Slip Op 00207

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 00207 (People v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Smith, 2026 NY Slip Op 00207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Smith (2026 NY Slip Op 00207)
People v Smith
2026 NY Slip Op 00207
Decided on January 15, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: January 15, 2026
Before: Kennedy, J.P., Gesmer, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Chan, JJ.

Ind No. 30/17|30/17|Appeal No. 5606|Case No. 2022-04871|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Jay Smith, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Nancy E. Little of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Oliver Lee of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph A. Fabrizio, J.), entered on or about October 3, 2022, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent predicate sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it denied defendant's request for a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]). Defendant has demonstrated an extremely high risk of recidivism, evidenced by his repeated convictions for forcible touching (Penal Law § 130.52) and persistent sexual abuse (Penal Law § 130.53). These prior convictions resulted in defendant being adjudicated as a level two sex offender, which did not deter the instant offenses for forcible touching and persistent sexual abuse. Separately, the restrictions on his housing based on his risk level three adjudication do not constitute a mitigating factor where it "has no bearing on his risk of reoffense or the threat he poses to public safety" (People v Bevel, 224 AD3d 430, 431 [1st Dept 2024], lv denied 42 NY3d 902 [2024]). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: January 15, 2026



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 00207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-smith-nyappdiv-2026.