People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Smith

23 A.D.2d 893, 260 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4080

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 23 A.D.2d 893 (People v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Smith, 23 A.D.2d 893, 260 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered May 20, 1964 upon resentence, after a jury trial, convicting him of rape in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the first degree, and carrying and use of a dangerous weapon, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. Judgment affirmed. Pursuant to the order of this court (22 A D 2d 927) a separate hearing upon the issue of the voluntariness of defendant’s confession was held by the trial court without a jury. On this appeal the trial court’s decision finding the confession to have been voluntary was duly reviewed together with all the other issues raised by the defendant. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered May 20, 1964 upon resentence, after a jury trial, convicting him of rape in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the first degree, and carrying and use of a dangerous weapon, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. Judgment affirmed. Pursuant to the order of this court (22 A D 2d 927) a separate hearing upon the issue of the voluntariness of defendant’s confession was held by the trial court without a jury. On this appeal the trial court’s decision finding the confession to have been voluntary was duly reviewed together with all the other issues raised by the defendant. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 893, 260 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-smith-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack