People v. Smith

314 N.E.2d 875, 34 N.Y.2d 758, 358 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1557
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 1974·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. Defendants’ claim that no probable cause existed for their arrest on the charge of loitering was waived when they pleaded guilty to that charge. However, the court erred when it prohibited defendants from conferring with their attorney during trial, albeit for a limited time. It was also error for the trial court to deny counsel’s request to be removed as counsel for the defendants when it became apparent that he would have to testify at the trial thereby placing his credibility in issue.

Accordingly, the orders appealed from should be reversed, the convictions vacated and a new trial ordered.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Smith, 314 N.E.2d 875, 34 N.Y.2d 758, 358 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1557 (N.Y. 1974).

314 N.E.2d 875 (People v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Reily
305 A.D.2d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)