People v. Smith

196 N.W.2d 11, 38 Mich. App. 277
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 18, 1972
DocketDocket No. 11258
StatusPublished

This text of 196 N.W.2d 11 (People v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Smith, 196 N.W.2d 11, 38 Mich. App. 277 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion.

Defendant pleaded guilty to assault with intent to rob being armed and he appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.

Upon an examination of the briefs and record it is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 N.W.2d 11, 38 Mich. App. 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-smith-michctapp-1972.