People v. Smiley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Smiley

239 A.D.2d 630, 657 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4540

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Smiley. Read the opinion of the Court — 225 A.D.2d 1097 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 1, 1997·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered June 10, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no non-frivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. Defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty to the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. His sentence was in accordance with the plea agreement and within the relevant statutory requirements. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered June 10, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no non-frivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. Defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty to the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. His sentence was in accordance with the plea agreement and within the relevant statutory requirements. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

People v. Smiley, 239 A.D.2d 630, 657 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

239 A.D.2d 630 (People v. Smiley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related