People v. Smart
81 N.E.3d 379, 29 N.Y.3d 1098
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The record supports the Appellate Division’s finding that the challenged lineup was not unduly suggestive. Accordingly, defendant’s claim is beyond our further review (People v McBride, 14 NY3d 440, 448 [2010] [citation omitted]).
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Smart, 81 N.E.3d 379, 29 N.Y.3d 1098 (N.Y. 2017).
81 N.E.3d 379 (People v. Smart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Palacios
2025 NY Slip Op 00114 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Smart v. Lamanna
E.D. New York, 2023
People v. Makropoulos
180 N.Y.S.3d 285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Irizarry
2020 NY Slip Op 3246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Serrano
2019 NY Slip Op 5026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Carew
2018 NY Slip Op 8947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Quintana
2018 NY Slip Op 1501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)