People v. Smalls

2020 NY Slip Op 05947, 131 N.Y.S.3d 265, 187 A.D.3d 1067
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 21, 2020
DocketInd. No. 4511/09
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 05947 (People v. Smalls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Smalls, 2020 NY Slip Op 05947, 131 N.Y.S.3d 265, 187 A.D.3d 1067 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Smalls (2020 NY Slip Op 05947)
People v Smalls
2020 NY Slip Op 05947
Decided on October 21, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 21, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SHERI S. ROMAN
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2017-06112
(Ind. No. 4511/09)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Adrian Smalls, appellant.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (David H. Yin of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Danny K. Chun, J.), rendered April 12, 2017, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192(3). Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Sajous
2025 NY Slip Op 05111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 05947, 131 N.Y.S.3d 265, 187 A.D.3d 1067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-smalls-nyappdiv-2020.