People v. SLOTKOWSKI
This text of 737 N.W.2d 699 (People v. SLOTKOWSKI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Alvin SLOTKOWSKI, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND these cases to the Oakland Circuit Court for correction of the judgments of sentence to reflect that the restitution ordered shall be joint and several with the codefendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons stated in her dissent in People v. Conway, 474 Mich. 1140, 716 N.W.2d 554 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
737 N.W.2d 699, 480 Mich. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-slotkowski-mich-2007.